<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research ethics, journalism, and paid participation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transpacifica.net/2009/04/13/research-ethics-journalism-and-paid-participation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transpacifica.net/2009/04/13/research-ethics-journalism-and-paid-participation/</link>
	<description>News, commentary, and resources on the transpacific world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:50:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myopinion</title>
		<link>http://transpacifica.net/2009/04/13/research-ethics-journalism-and-paid-participation/comment-page-1/#comment-82505</link>
		<dc:creator>Myopinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transpacifica.net/?p=505#comment-82505</guid>
		<description>As a Field Interviewer I have participated in several studies that paid respondents $30 at completion of the interview. In 2008 it seemed to help in cooperation. Later, the $30 was scoffed at by some and did little to decrease avoidance issues. Some respondents still appreciated the compensation. Some will not participate regardless, some will participate because they feel a civic duty... Some simply won&#039;t answer the door; some 

Many sources are available at this link: http://www.marketingprofs.com/ea/qst_question.asp?qstID=31605 

http://www.copafs.org/seminars/use_of_incentives_five_questions.aspx

http://www.rti.org/pubs/aapor07_currivan_paper.pdf

I do not think you can compare Journalism Sources to Study Respondents.

Even though you obviously do not financially need to work as a Field Interviewer, if you have not done so--I highly recommend it. Not as a researcher, not as admin--but on the ground level as a FIELD Interviewer/Data Collector. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Field Interviewer I have participated in several studies that paid respondents $30 at completion of the interview. In 2008 it seemed to help in cooperation. Later, the $30 was scoffed at by some and did little to decrease avoidance issues. Some respondents still appreciated the compensation. Some will not participate regardless, some will participate because they feel a civic duty&#8230; Some simply won&#8217;t answer the door; some </p>
<p>Many sources are available at this link: <a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/ea/qst_question.asp?qstID=31605" class="aga aga_0" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingprofs.com/ea/qst_question.asp?qstID=31605</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.copafs.org/seminars/use_of_incentives_five_questions.aspx" class="aga aga_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.copafs.org/seminars/use_of_incentives_five_questions.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rti.org/pubs/aapor07_currivan_paper.pdf" class="aga aga_2" rel="nofollow">http://www.rti.org/pubs/aapor07_currivan_paper.pdf</a></p>
<p>I do not think you can compare Journalism Sources to Study Respondents.</p>
<p>Even though you obviously do not financially need to work as a Field Interviewer, if you have not done so&#8211;I highly recommend it. Not as a researcher, not as admin&#8211;but on the ground level as a FIELD Interviewer/Data Collector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

